GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K420

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K420

2014Core: 771 MHzBoost: 784 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K420 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 52.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Draws 64W instead of 108W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K420

2014

Why buy it

  • 82.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 68.8% higher power demand at 108W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 82.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 340 instead at 738 vs 726, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52.5% (7.4 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K420 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

Quadro K420

The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the Quadro K420 reaches 726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 1,344 (Quadro K420). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K420
G3D Mark Score
738+2%
726
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1344+250%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS+176%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
112+250%
L1 Cache
32 KB
112 KB+250%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K420 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K420
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the Quadro K420. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 340) vs 512 KB (Quadro K420) — the Quadro K420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K420
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the Quadro K420's 108W — a 51.2% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (Quadro K420). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K420
TDP
64W-41%
108W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
11.5+72%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the Quadro K420 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 340 was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 4.8 (Quadro K420) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 54.2% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K420
MSRP
$100-33%
$150
Performance per Dollar
7.4+54%
4.8
Codename
GK107
GK104
Release
May 29 2014
July 22 2014
Ranking
#777
#475

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.