GeForce GT 340 vs GRID K140Q
GeForce GT 340
Popular choices:
GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 340 is positioned at rank 170 and the GRID K140Q is on rank 197, so the GeForce GT 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 340
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K140Q.
| Insight | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2434.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2434.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 340 and GRID K140Q
GeForce GT 340
The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the GRID K140Q reaches 728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 738+1% | 728 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+200% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 340 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 340 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 340) vs 512 KB (GRID K140Q) — the GRID K140Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 340) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 340) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | VP4 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-72% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5+259% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 340 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125 and now averages $500. The GeForce GT 340 costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.9 (GeForce GT 340) vs 1.5 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 2360% better value. The GeForce GT 340 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 340 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-20% | $125 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-96% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.9+2360% | 1.5 |
| Codename | GK107 | GK104 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #777 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 340 and GRID K140Q
