Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID K140Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID K140Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID K140Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 340
1 GB 64
738
+1.4%
brand logoGeForce 8800 GTS
brand logoGeForce 9800 GTX+
brand logoGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
brand logoGeForce GT 735M
brand logoGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
GRID K140Q
0.5 GB 225
728
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 8800 GTS
brand logoGeForce GT 625M
brand logoGeForce GT 720A
brand logoGeForce GTS 360M
brand logoGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID K140Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 26.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID K140Q

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    25% HIGHER MSRP
    $125 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 340 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (738 vs 728), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $25 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 26.7% (7.4 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID K140Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GRID K140Q

The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the GRID K140Q reaches 728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
G3D Mark Score
738+1%
728
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+200%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K140Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 340 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the GRID K140Q. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 340) vs 512 KB (GRID K140Q) — the GRID K140Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 340) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
11_0
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 340) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
Encoder
None
NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder
VP4
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
TDP
64W-72%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
267mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
75
—
Perf/Watt
11.5+259%
3.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GeForce GT 340 was 20% cheaper ($25 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 5.8 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 27.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 340 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 340GRID K140Q
MSRP
$100-20%
$125
Performance per Dollar
7.4+28%
5.8
Codename
GK107
GK104
Release
May 29 2014
June 28 2013
Ranking
#777
#628
Search GeForce GT 340 on AmazonSearch GRID K140Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.