GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K1000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 64W instead of 100W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K1000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

  • 93.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 56.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 93.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (756 vs 738), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K1000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 340 vs Quadro K1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the Quadro K1000M reaches 756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K1000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 1,536 (Quadro K1000M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K1000M
G3D Mark Score
738
756+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS+211%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K1000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K1000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K1000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 340) vs 512 KB (Quadro K1000M) — the Quadro K1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K1000M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the Quadro K1000M's 100W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (Quadro K1000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K1000M
TDP
64W-36%
100W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
11.5+51%
7.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 340 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Quadro K1000M
MSRP
$100
Codename
GK107
GK104
Release
May 29 2014
July 23 2013
Ranking
#777
#562

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.