GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A10-7800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A10-7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 180W, a 116W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 A10-7800

2024

Why buy it

✅110.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
55% HIGHER MSRP
$155 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($155 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌181.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 110.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (740 vs 738), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $55 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $155, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 54.6% (7.4 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 A10-7800 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 A10-7800

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A10-7800
G3D Mark Score	738	740
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384	3840+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	35.87 TFLOPS+4604%
ROPs	16	96+500%
TMUs	32	240+650%
L1 Cache	32 KB	768 KB+2300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A10-7800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 340 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7800. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 340) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A10-7800
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A10-7800
TDP	64W-64%	180W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	11.5+180%	4.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155. On MSRP, GeForce GT 340 was 35.5% cheaper ($55 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 54.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7800 (2024 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP	$100-35%	$155
Performance per Dollar	7.4+54%	4.8
Codename	GK107	Navi 32
Release	May 29 2014	September 11 2024
Ranking	#777	#131

Search GeForce GT 340 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A10-7800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.