GeForce GT 340
VS
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

GeForce GT 340 vs Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 340 is positioned at rank 170 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is on rank 482, so the GeForce GT 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 340

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
983%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
944%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
933%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
932%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
930%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
925%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
913%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
909%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
901%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
899%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
888%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
886%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
870%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
869%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
98%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#94
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
92%
#95
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
91%
#155
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1084%
#170
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#171
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
99%
#172
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
99%
#175
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
97%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
95%
#178
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
95%
#181
Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#183
GeForce GT 610
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#185
Radeon HD 6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

#472
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2193%
#474
1988%
#475
1983%
#479
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1803%
#480
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1791%
#482
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
99%
#484
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#485
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
97%
#487
97%
#488
96%
#489
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
96%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#491
96%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
#493
95%
#494
95%
#495
91%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 340 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 98.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+98.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 340 and Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

The Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 742 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual reaches 742 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
G3D Mark Score
738
742
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 340 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
TDP
64W
50W-22%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
11.5
14.8+29%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 340 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $40. The GeForce GT 340 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.9 (GeForce GT 340) vs 18.6 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 98.4% better value. The GeForce GT 340 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 340Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP
$100-33%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$20-50%
$40
Performance per Dollar
36.9+98%
18.6
Codename
GK107
Release
May 29 2014
August 1 2013
Ranking
#777
#881