GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 150W, a 86W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 285M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

2009

Why buy it

✅84.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌134.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 340 instead at 738 vs 734, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 285M SLI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 340 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI reaches 734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
G3D Mark Score	738	734
Architecture	Kepler	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 285M SLI carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 340 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 285M SLI.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 340) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 340) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 340) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Encoder	None	PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder	VP4	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the GeForce GTX 285M SLI's 150W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 95°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
TDP	64W-57%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-21%	95°C
Perf/Watt	11.5+135%	4.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 340 (2014 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	GK107	N10E-GTX
Release	May 29 2014	March 2 2009
Ranking	#777	#753

Search GeForce GT 340 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 285M SLI on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.