GeForce GT 340 vs GRID P4-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID P4-1Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID P4-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 340

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,790 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5854.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 225W, a 161W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5790% HIGHER MSRP
$5,890 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 7.4 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌251.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 340 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (738 vs 730), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,790 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $5,890, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5854.5% (7.4 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 340 vs GRID P4-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 340 scores 738 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 340 is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 340) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GRID P4-1Q
G3D Mark Score	738+1%	730
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+533%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	768 KB+2300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 340 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P4-1Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GRID P4-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 340 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-1Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 340 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 340 and 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 340) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GRID P4-1Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 340 draws 64W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 340) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GRID P4-1Q
TDP	64W-72%	225W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	11.5+259%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 340 came in at $100, while the GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890. On MSRP, GeForce GT 340 was 98.3% cheaper ($5790 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.4 (GeForce GT 340) vs 0.1 (GRID P4-1Q) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 7300% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-1Q (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 340	GRID P4-1Q
MSRP	$100-98%	$5890
Performance per Dollar	7.4+7300%	0.1
Codename	GK107	GM204
Release	May 29 2014	August 30 2015
Ranking	#777	#525

Search GeForce GT 340 on Amazon

Search GRID P4-1Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.