Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A10-8850

AMD

Radeon HD 6650M

2011Core: 580 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A10-8850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6650M

2011

Why buy it

  • 56.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6650M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6650M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.0% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A10-8850 instead at 773 vs 762, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6650M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A10-8850 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 6650M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6650M vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6650M

The Radeon HD 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 580 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6650M scores 762 and the Radeon R7 A10-8850 reaches 773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6650M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 960 (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Raw compute: 1.114 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850).

FeatureRadeon HD 6650MRadeon R7 A10-8850
G3D Mark Score
762
773+1%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960+88%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.114 TFLOPS+36%
0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6650MRadeon R7 A10-8850
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6650M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6650M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 6650M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the Radeon HD 6650M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 6650MRadeon R7 A10-8850
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6650M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6650M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureRadeon HD 6650MRadeon R7 A10-8850
TDP
50W-9%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
15.2+8%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8850 (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6650MRadeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP
$250
Codename
Blackcomb
Cape Verde
Release
January 4 2011
July 6 2016
Ranking
#785
#667

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.