Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K

AMD

Radeon R5 435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7650K

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 435

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7650K across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 A8-7650K

2014

Why buy it

  • 3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A8-7650K is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 435 instead at 762 vs 757, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 435 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 435 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon R7 A8-7650K still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7650K

The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 757 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 435 scores 762 and the Radeon R7 A8-7650K reaches 757 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 435) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 825 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
G3D Mark Score
762
757
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
384+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS+4%
0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1030 MHz+25%
825 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
20
24+20%
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7650K. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 435) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7650K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 435) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
DirectX
12 (FL 11_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 435) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 435) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 435 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 435) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
TDP
30W
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
25.4
25.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 435 came in at $80, while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7650K was 100+% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) vs Infinity (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7650K offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 435 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A8-7650K
MSRP
$80
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
9.5
Infinity
Codename
Jet
Opal
Release
May 15 2016
January 9 2014
Ranking
#922
#890

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.