
Radeon R5 435

Radeon R7 A10-7700K
Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Civilization VI
Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R5 435
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $152 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $152 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-7700K across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
2023Why buy it
- ✅110.5% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌90% HIGHER MSRP$152 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($152 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 435
The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K
The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 772 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 435 scores 762 and the Radeon R7 A10-7700K reaches 772 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-7700K uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 435) vs 2,048 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 2500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 435 | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 762 | 772+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 2048+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6592 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+3007% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | 2500 MHz+143% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 20 | 128+540% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 435 | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7700K. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 435) vs 2 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 435 | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 435 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7700K's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 435) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 435 | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-70% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.4+230% | 7.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R5 435 came in at $80, while the Radeon R7 A10-7700K launched at $152. On MSRP, Radeon R5 435 was 47.4% cheaper ($72 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) vs 5.1 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) — the Radeon R5 435 offers 86.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7700K (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R5 435 | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-47% | $152 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.5+86% | 5.1 |
| Codename | Jet | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 15 2016 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #922 | #140 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














