Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 435

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 208.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8850 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

✅13.3% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
212.5% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.3% in average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (773 vs 762), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 435 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 435 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 208.1% (9.5 vs 3.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 A10-8850 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 435 scores 762 and the Radeon R7 A10-8850 reaches 773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 435) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850).

Feature	Radeon R5 435	Radeon R7 A10-8850
G3D Mark Score	762	773+1%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	512+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6592 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	20	32+60%
L1 Cache	80 KB	128 KB+60%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 435	Radeon R7 A10-8850
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 435) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the Radeon R7 A10-8850 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 435	Radeon R7 A10-8850
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 435 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 55W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 435) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon R5 435	Radeon R7 A10-8850
TDP	30W-45%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	25.4+80%	14.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 435 came in at $80, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R5 435 was 68% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) vs 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the Radeon R5 435 offers 206.5% better value.

Feature	Radeon R5 435	Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP	$80-68%	$250
Performance per Dollar	9.5+206%	3.1
Codename	Jet	Cape Verde
Release	May 15 2016	July 6 2016
Ranking	#922	#667

Search Radeon R5 435 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A10-8850 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.