Radeon R5 435
VS
Radeon R7 A10-8850

Radeon R5 435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850

AMD

Radeon R5 435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 435 is positioned at rank 376 and the Radeon R7 A10-8850 is on rank 288, so the Radeon R7 A10-8850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 435

#366
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1139%
#368
1033%
#369
1030%
#373
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
937%
#374
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
930%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
93%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
91%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
91%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
90%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
90%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-8850

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2348%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2255%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
2229%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2225%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2221%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
2208%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2180%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2172%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2152%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2146%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2120%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2116%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2078%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2076%
#273
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2589%
#288
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#290
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
96%
#291
Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
92%
#292
Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $9
87%
#293
GeForce GTX 260
MSRP: $449|Avg: $449
86%
#294
Radeon HD 8490
MSRP: $99|Avg: $35
86%
#295
Radeon HD 8650D
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
85%
#297
Radeon HDG 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
82%
#298
Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $219|Avg: $15
82%
#299
Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
80%
#300
Radeon HD 6310
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
79%
#301
GeForce GTX 295
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
78%
#302
Radeon HD 4870 X2
MSRP: $550|Avg: $550
77%
#303
Radeon HD 3850 X2
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 435.

InsightRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 435 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 435 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $250), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 208.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+208.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 435 and Radeon R7 A10-8850

AMD

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 435 scores 762 and the Radeon R7 A10-8850 reaches 773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 435) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850).

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
G3D Mark Score
762
773+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
512+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
0.8192 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
20
32+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 435) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the Radeon R7 A10-8850 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 435 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 55W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 435) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
TDP
30W-45%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
25.4+80%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 435 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 launched at $250 and now averages $250. The Radeon R5 435 costs 68% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) vs 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the Radeon R5 435 offers 206.5% better value.

FeatureRadeon R5 435Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP
$80-68%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$80-68%
$250
Performance per Dollar
9.5+206%
3.1
Codename
Jet
Cape Verde
Release
May 15 2016
July 6 2016
Ranking
#922
#667