A10-6700 vs Core i3-4330T

A10-6700 vs Core i3-4330T Performance Spectrum

A10-6700

4 / 4

3,109

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4330T

2 / 4

3,105

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700 vs Core i3-4330T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700 vs Core i3-4330T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4330T.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i3-4330T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,105 vs 3,109).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while A10-6700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700 better than Core i3-4330T?

Yes. A10-6700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-6700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4330T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700 vs Core i3-4330T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700

The A10-6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-4330T

The Core i3-4330T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,105 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4330T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6700 versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-4330T — a 35.6% clock advantage for the A10-6700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-6700 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4330T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700 scores 3,109 against the Core i3-4330T's 3,105 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-6700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 438 vs 956, a 74.3% lead for the Core i3-4330T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330T.

Feature	A10-6700	Core i3-4330T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+43%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+23%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,109	3,105
Geekbench 6 Single	438	956+118%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,847

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4330T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6700 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330T — the A10-6700 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-6700 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-6700) and H81,B85,H87,H97,Z87,Z97 (Core i3-4330T).

Feature	A10-6700	Core i3-4330T
Socket	FM2	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6700) vs Yes (Core i3-4330T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8670D (A10-6700) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4330T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6700 rivals Core i3-3240.