A10-6700
VS
Ryzen Embedded R1305G

A10-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

AMD

A10-6700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-6700 is positioned at rank 415 and the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is on rank 856, so the A10-6700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6015%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5684%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4127%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1243%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
985%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
862%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
493%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
487%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
443%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
443%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
438%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
427%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
421%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
419%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
415%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
99%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
99%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
98%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#415
A10-6700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
99%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
98%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
98%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
98%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
96%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded R1305G

#844
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1400%
#845
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1380%
#846
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1267%
#847
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1261%
#848
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1250%
#850
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1207%
#851
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1157%
#852
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1155%
#853
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1124%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-6700Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-6700 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-6700Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-6700 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G

AMD

A10-6700

The A10-6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $130.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A10-6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6700 versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 42.3% clock advantage for the A10-6700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A10-6700 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700 scores 3,109 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureA10-6700Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+54%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+147%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,109
3,142+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
438
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA10-6700Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket
FM2
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1305G). The A10-6700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6700 rivals Core i3-3240.

FeatureA10-6700Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8670D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget