A10-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Ryzen Embedded R1305G needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,109 vs 3,142).
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while A10-6700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R1305G better than A10-6700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-6700 is ahead with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R1305G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-6700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700

The A10-6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $130.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6700 versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 42.3% clock advantage for the A10-6700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A10-6700 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700 scores 3,109 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Feature	A10-6700	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+54%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+147%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,109	3,142+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	438	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6700	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket	FM2	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1305G). The A10-6700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6700 rivals Core i3-3240.