A10-6700 vs Core i5-6360U

A10-6700 vs Core i5-6360U Performance Spectrum

A10-6700

4 / 4

3,109

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-6360U

2 / 4

3,112

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700 vs Core i5-6360U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700 vs Core i5-6360U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Core i5-6360U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-6360U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,109 vs 3,112).

Core i5-6360U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6360U better than A10-6700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-6700 is ahead with a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6360U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6360U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6360U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-6360U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6360U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700 vs Core i5-6360U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700

The A10-6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,109 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-6360U

The Core i5-6360U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6360U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6700 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-6360U — a 32.4% clock advantage for the A10-6700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-6700 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-6360U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700 scores 3,109 against the Core i5-6360U's 3,112 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-6360U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6360U.

Feature	A10-6700	Core i5-6360U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+39%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+85%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,109	3,112
Geekbench 6 Single	438	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6360U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6700	Core i5-6360U
Socket	FM2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700) / not specified (Core i5-6360U). The A10-6700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core i5-6360U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6700 rivals Core i3-3240.