Core i5-4288U
VS
FX-4100

Core i5-4288U vs FX-4100

Intel

Core i5-4288U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

FX-4100

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4288U is positioned at rank 1135 and the FX-4100 is on rank 728, so the FX-4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4288U

#1123
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3776%
#1124
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3721%
#1125
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3416%
#1126
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3400%
#1127
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3369%
#1129
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3254%
#1130
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3120%
#1131
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3115%
#1132
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3031%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
100%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
99%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
98%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
97%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13630%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12879%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9351%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2817%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1952%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1118%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1103%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1005%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1005%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
993%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
967%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
953%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
949%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
941%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
100%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
100%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
100%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
100%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
99%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
98%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
98%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
98%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
98%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-4100 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-4288U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-4288UFX-4100
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the FX-4100 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 94% cheaper ($20 vs $342) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-4288UFX-4100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1591%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4288U and FX-4100

Intel

Core i5-4288U

The Core i5-4288U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $342.

AMD

FX-4100

The FX-4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,630 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4288U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4100 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4288U versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-4100 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the FX-4100 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-4288U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4288U scores 2,659 against the FX-4100's 2,630 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-4288U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4288U vs 8192 kB on the FX-4100.

FeatureCore i5-4288UFX-4100
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
8192 kB+167%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,659+1%
2,630
Geekbench 6 Single
880
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4288U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4288UFX-4100
Socket
FCBGA1168
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-4288U) / not specified (FX-4100). The Core i5-4288U includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Graphics 5100), while the FX-4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4288U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i5-4288UFX-4100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-4288U launched at $342 MSRP, while the FX-4100 debuted at $115.

FeatureCore i5-4288UFX-4100
MSRP
$342
$115-66%
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Release Date
2013
2011