Core i5-4300Y
VS
Celeron N2810

Core i5-4300Y vs Celeron N2810

Intel

Core i5-4300Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron N2810

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4300Y is positioned at rank 792 and the Celeron N2810 is on rank 605, so the Celeron N2810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4300Y

#780
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1185%
#781
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1168%
#782
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1072%
#783
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1067%
#784
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1058%
#786
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1021%
#787
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
979%
#788
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
978%
#789
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
952%
#792
Core i5-4300Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#795
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
99%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
98%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2810

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#593
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
796%
#594
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
785%
#595
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
720%
#596
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
717%
#597
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
710%
#599
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
686%
#600
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
658%
#601
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
657%
#602
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
639%
#605
Celeron N2810
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4300Y delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N2810 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-4300YCeleron N2810
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4300YCeleron N2810
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4300Y and Celeron N2810

Intel

Core i5-4300Y

The Core i5-4300Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4300Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron N2810's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300Y versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-4300Y (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4300Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2810 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4300Y scores 1,485 against the Celeron N2810's 1,474 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4300Y. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4300Y vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2810.

FeatureCore i5-4300YCeleron N2810
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz+15%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,485
1,474
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4300Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2810 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4300YCeleron N2810
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-4300Y) / true (Celeron N2810). The Celeron N2810 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core i5-4300Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.

FeatureCore i5-4300YCeleron N2810
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true