Core i5-4300Y vs Opteron X3216

Core i5-4300Y vs Opteron X3216 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4300Y

2 / 4

1,485

0.0%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,498

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4300Y vs Opteron X3216 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4300Y vs Opteron X3216: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4300Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,485 vs 1,498).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Opteron X3216

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X3216 better than Core i5-4300Y?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X3216 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4300Y is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron X3216 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 30 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron X3216 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X3216 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron X3216 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3216 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4300Y vs Opteron X3216 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4300Y

The Core i5-4300Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $281.

Opteron X3216

The Opteron X3216 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,498 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4300Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Opteron X3216's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300Y versus 3 GHz on the Opteron X3216 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Opteron X3216 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-4300Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X3216 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4300Y scores 1,485 against the Opteron X3216's 1,498 — a 0.9% lead for the Opteron X3216.

Feature	Core i5-4300Y	Opteron X3216
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark	1,485	1,498

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4300Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X3216 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.