Celeron N2810 vs Core i5-4300Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2810 vs Core i5-4300Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2810 vs Core i5-4300Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2810

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core i5-4300Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,474 vs 1,485).

Core i5-4300Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2810 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4300Y better than Celeron N2810?

Yes. Core i5-4300Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4300Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4300Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4300Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4300Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2810 vs Core i5-4300Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Core i5-4300Y

The Core i5-4300Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2810 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4300Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300Y — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-4300Y (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron N2810 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4300Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2810 scores 1,474 against the Core i5-4300Y's 1,485 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4300Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2810 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4300Y.

Feature	Celeron N2810	Core i5-4300Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.3 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2 GHz+25%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,474	1,485

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2810 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4300Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2810	Core i5-4300Y
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2810) / not specified (Core i5-4300Y). The Celeron N2810 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core i5-4300Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.