Celeron N2810 vs Pentium G860

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2810 vs Pentium G860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2810 vs Pentium G860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2810

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 256W, a 249W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,474 vs 1,485).

Pentium G860

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Celeron N2810 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3557.1% higher power demand at 256W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G860 better than Celeron N2810?

Yes. Pentium G860 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G860 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G860 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G860 is the better buy right now. Pentium G860 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2810 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2810 vs Pentium G860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2810

The Celeron N2810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,474 points. Launch price was $260.

Pentium G860

The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2810 and Pentium G860 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2810 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 — a 40% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron N2810 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G860 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2810 scores 1,474 against the Pentium G860's 1,485 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G860. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2810 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860.

Feature	Celeron N2810	Pentium G860
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,474	1,485

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2810 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G860 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron N2810 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G860 — the Pentium G860 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2810) vs 16 (Pentium G860) — the Pentium G860 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron N2810	Pentium G860
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N2810) vs VT-x (Pentium G860). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2810) and HD Graphics (Pentium G860) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G860 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2810 rivals AMD A4-1250.