
Core i5-4308U

Core i7-930
Core i5-4308U vs Core i7-930 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4308U vs Core i7-930 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4308U vs Core i7-930: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4308U
2014Why buy it
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Graphics 5100, while Core i7-930 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-930 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,978 vs 2,993).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- β293.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 130W.
Core i7-930
2010Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Draws 130W instead of 512W, a 382W reduction.
- β 200% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i5-4308U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-4308U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-930 better than Core i5-4308U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4308U vs Core i7-930 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4308U
The Core i5-4308U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,978 points. Launch price was $315.

Core i7-930
The Core i7-930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,993 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4308U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-930 offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-930 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4308U versus 3.06 GHz on the Core i7-930 β a 7.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4308U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-4308U uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-930 uses Bloomfield (2008β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4308U scores 2,978 against the Core i7-930's 2,993 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-930. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4308U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-930.
| Feature | Core i5-4308U | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+8% | 3.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Bloomfield (2008β2010) |
| PassMark | 2,978 | 2,993 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4308U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-930 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4308U versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-930 β the Core i5-4308U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-930 supports up to 24 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-4308U) vs 3 (Core i7-930). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4308U) vs 36 (Core i7-930) β the Core i7-930 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-4308U | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+50% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 36+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-4308U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 5100), while the Core i7-930 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4308U targets Mobile, Core i7-930 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-4308U | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Graphics 5100 | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mobile | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













