Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4308U

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4308U Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 760K

4 / 4

2,982

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4308U

2 / 4

2,978

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4308U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4308U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-4308U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i5-4308U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4308U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-4308U

2014

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Graphics 5100, while Athlon X4 760K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 760K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,978 vs 2,982).
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 760K better than Core i5-4308U?

Yes. Athlon X4 760K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 760K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 760K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 760K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 760K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4308U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-4308U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-4308U

The Core i5-4308U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,978 points. Launch price was $315.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4308U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4308U — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4308U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Core i5-4308U's 2,978 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 760K.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-4308U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+24%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,982	2,978
Geekbench 6 Single	495	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,404	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4308U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4308U — the Athlon X4 760K supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 760K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 12 (Core i5-4308U) — the Athlon X4 760K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-4308U
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4308U). The Core i5-4308U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 5100), while the Athlon X4 760K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget, Core i5-4308U targets Mobile.