Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-3470T

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-3470T Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 760K

4 / 4

2,982

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3470T

2 / 4

2,999

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-3470T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-3470T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-3470T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,982 vs 2,999).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Core i5-3470T

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 760K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 760K better than Core i5-3470T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 760K is ahead with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3470T pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3470T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 760K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 760K comes in $84 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $184 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-3470T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 83.0% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 16.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 760K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-3470T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-3470T

The Core i5-3470T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,999 points. Launch price was $210.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3470T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3470T — a 13% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3470T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Core i5-3470T's 2,999 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-3470T.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-3470T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+14%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+31%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,982	2,999
Geekbench 6 Single	495	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,404	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3470T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-3470T
Socket	FM2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) / not specified (Core i5-3470T). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-3470T
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 760K was priced at $100, while the Core i5-3470T came in at $184. On launch pricing ($100 vs $184), Athlon X4 760K was $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3470T — making the Athlon X4 760K the 58.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-3470T
MSRP	$100-46%	$184
Performance per Dollar	29.8+83%	16.3
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Athlon X4 760K on Amazon

Search Core i5-3470T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.