Athlon X4 760K vs FX-4300

Athlon X4 760K vs FX-4300 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 760K

4 / 4

2,982

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

FX-4300

4 / 4

2,995

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs FX-4300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs FX-4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
✅Delivers 21.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike FX-4300.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,982 vs 2,995).

FX-4300

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 95W instead of 100W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.5 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 760K better than FX-4300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 760K is ahead with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, FX-4300 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 760K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 760K comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that FX-4300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 21.5% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 24.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 760K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X4 760K vs FX-4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

FX-4300

The FX-4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,995 points. Launch price was $122.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 760K and FX-4300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 4 GHz on the FX-4300 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-4300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the FX-4300's 2,995 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-4300.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	FX-4300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+2%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
L2 Cache	4 MB	4096 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	2,982	2,995
Geekbench 6 Single	495	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,404	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	FX-4300
Socket	FM2	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) / not specified (FX-4300). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	FX-4300
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 760K was priced at $100, while the FX-4300 came in at $122. On launch pricing ($100 vs $122), Athlon X4 760K was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the FX-4300 — making the Athlon X4 760K the 19.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	FX-4300
MSRP	$100-18%	$122
Performance per Dollar	29.8+22%	24.5
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Athlon X4 760K on Amazon

Search FX-4300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.