CPU
GPU
Athlon X4 760K
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 760K is positioned at rank 599 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is on rank 880, so the Athlon X4 760K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 760K
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 760K | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 760K | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+646%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 760K and Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Athlon X4 760K
The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.66 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,000 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 1.66 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — a 84.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K. The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1600's 3,000 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+147% | 1.66 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,982 | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 495 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,404 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K versus 667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 supports 198.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 760K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1600) — the Athlon X4 760K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K) and GL40,GM45,GM47,PM45 (Celeron Dual-Core T1600).
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | 667+22133% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+838860700% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) vs false (Celeron Dual-Core T1600). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget, Celeron Dual-Core T1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 rivals Pentium T2390.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | false |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 760K launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 debuted at $150. At current prices ($20 vs $150), the Athlon X4 760K is $130 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 149.1 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 — making the Athlon X4 760K the 152.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-87% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 149.1+646% | 20.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X4 760K and Celeron Dual-Core T1600
