Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-6200U Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 760K

4 / 4

2,982

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-6200U

2 / 4

2,990

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-6200U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-6200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-6200U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,982 vs 2,990).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Core i5-6200U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-6200U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-6200U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 520, while Athlon X4 760K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 760K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-6200U better than Athlon X4 760K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 760K is ahead with a 11.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6200U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-6200U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-6200U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-6200U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Athlon X4 760K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6200U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 760K vs Core i5-6200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-6200U

The Core i5-6200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,990 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6200U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6200U — a 37.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-6200U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Core i5-6200U's 2,990 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-6200U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 495 vs 946, a 62.6% lead for the Core i5-6200U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-6200U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+46%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+65%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,982	2,990
Geekbench 6 Single	495	946+91%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,404	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6200U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6200U — the Core i5-6200U supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 12 (Core i5-6200U) — the Athlon X4 760K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K) and Integrated (Core i5-6200U).

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Core i5-6200U
Socket	FM2	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6200U). The Core i5-6200U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 520), while the Athlon X4 760K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget, Core i5-6200U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6200U rivals A12-9700P.