Athlon X4 760K vs Pentium Silver

Athlon X4 760K vs Pentium Silver Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 760K

4 / 4

2,982

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Silver

2,989

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 760K vs Pentium Silver FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 760K vs Pentium Silver: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 760K

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Pentium Silver.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,982 vs 2,989).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Pentium Silver mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium Silver

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Silver better than Athlon X4 760K?

Yes. Pentium Silver is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium Silver is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Silver is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Silver is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium Silver comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X4 760K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (29.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Silver makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 760K vs Pentium Silver Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium Silver

The Pentium Silver is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 2,989 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X4 760K is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Pentium Silver's 2,989 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Silver.

Feature	Athlon X4 760K	Pentium Silver
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	—
L2 Cache	4 MB	—
Process	32 nm	—
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	2,982	2,989
Geekbench 6 Single	495	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,404	—