
Athlon X4 760K vs Xeon E5-2637

Athlon X4 760K

Xeon E5-2637
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 760K is positioned at rank 599 and the Xeon E5-2637 is on rank 1010, so the Athlon X4 760K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 760K
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2637
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 760K | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 760K | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+100%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 760K and Xeon E5-2637

Athlon X4 760K
The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2637
The Xeon E5-2637 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 5120 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,978 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 760K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2637 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Xeon E5-2637's 2,978 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 760K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 495 vs 550, a 10.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,404 vs 1,500 (6.6% advantage for the Xeon E5-2637).
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+17% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 5120 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 2,982 | 2,978 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 495 | 550+11% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,404 | 1,500+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2637 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2637). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2637) — the Xeon E5-2637 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K) and C600,X79 (Xeon E5-2637).
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 384 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2637). Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget, Xeon E5-2637 targets Server.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Server |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 760K launched at $100 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2637 debuted at $885. At current prices ($20 vs $40), the Athlon X4 760K is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 760K delivers 149.1 pts/$ vs 74.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2637 — making the Athlon X4 760K the 66.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 760K | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-89% | $885 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-50% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 149.1+100% | 74.5 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















