Athlon X4 760K
VS
Pentium Silver N6000

Athlon X4 760K vs Pentium Silver N6000

AMD

Athlon X4 760K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium Silver N6000

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 760K is positioned at rank 599 and the Pentium Silver N6000 is on rank 695, so the Athlon X4 760K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 760K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10453%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9877%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7172%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2161%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1711%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1497%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
857%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
846%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
771%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
770%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
762%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
741%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
731%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
728%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
721%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
100%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
99%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
99%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
98%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Silver N6000

#683
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
982%
#684
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
967%
#685
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
888%
#686
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
884%
#687
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
876%
#689
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
846%
#690
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
811%
#691
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
810%
#692
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
788%
#695
Pentium Silver N6000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#696
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
100%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
100%
#704
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium Silver N6000 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon X4 760KPentium Silver N6000
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon X4 760K (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon X4 760KPentium Silver N6000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 760K and Pentium Silver N6000

AMD

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium Silver N6000

The Pentium Silver N6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,989 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 760K and Pentium Silver N6000 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium Silver N6000 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Athlon X4 760K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Silver N6000 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 760K scores 2,982 against the Pentium Silver N6000's 2,989 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Silver N6000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 495 vs 473, a 4.5% lead for the Athlon X4 760K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,404 vs 1,090 (25.2% advantage for the Athlon X4 760K).

FeatureAthlon X4 760KPentium Silver N6000
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+24%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+245%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB (total)
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
2,982
2,989
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,911
Geekbench 6 Single
495+5%
473
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,404+29%
1,090
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 760K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Silver N6000 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K versus DDR4-2933 on the Pentium Silver N6000 — the Pentium Silver N6000 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 760K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 760K) vs 8 (Pentium Silver N6000) — the Athlon X4 760K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K) and SoC (Pentium Silver N6000).

FeatureAthlon X4 760KPentium Silver N6000
Socket
FM2
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2933+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Pentium Silver N6000). The Pentium Silver N6000 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (32 EU)), while the Athlon X4 760K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget, Pentium Silver N6000 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium Silver N6000 rivals Celeron N5105.

FeatureAthlon X4 760KPentium Silver N6000
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (32 EU)
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Budget