
Athlon Silver 3050e

Athlon X4 760K
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Athlon X4 760K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Athlon X4 760K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Athlon X4 760K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020Why buy it
- ✅+6.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 100W, a 99W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Athlon X4 760K needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 760K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X4 760K.
Athlon X4 760K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Athlon Silver 3050e.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,404 vs 1,494).
- ❌9900% higher power demand at 100W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon Silver 3050e better than Athlon X4 760K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Athlon X4 760K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X4 760K
The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver 3050e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 760K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 760K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K — a 37.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 760K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050e scores 2,979 against the Athlon X4 760K's 2,982 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 760K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 758 vs 495, a 42% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050e that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,494 vs 1,404 (6.2% advantage for the Athlon Silver 3050e).
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+171% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,979 | 2,982 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 758+53% | 495 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,494+6% | 1,404 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 760K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K — the Athlon Silver 3050e supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs 16 (Athlon X4 760K) — the Athlon X4 760K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Dalí (Athlon Silver 3050e) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K).
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400+29% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Athlon X4 760K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 760K targets Budget.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver 3050e was priced at $100, while the Athlon X4 760K came in at $100. On launch pricing ($100 vs $100), Athlon X4 760K was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050e delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 29.8 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 760K — making the Athlon X4 760K the 0.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Athlon X4 760K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8 | 29.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















