Athlon Silver 3050e
Core i7-930
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i7-930 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i7-930 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i7-930: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 192.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 10.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 130W, a 129W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-930 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-930 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,979 vs 2,993).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Core i7-930
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅350% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.2 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌12900% higher power demand at 130W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-930 better than Athlon Silver 3050e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i7-930 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i7-930
The Core i7-930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,993 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver 3050e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-930 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-930 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus 3.06 GHz on the Core i7-930 — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-930 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-930 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050e scores 2,979 against the Core i7-930's 2,993 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-930. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon Silver 3050e vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-930.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.06 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,979 | 2,993 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,494 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-930 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-930 — the Athlon Silver 3050e supports 125.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon Silver 3050e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs 3 (Core i7-930). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs 36 (Core i7-930) — the Core i7-930 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400+125% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 36+350% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-930). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-930 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-930 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver 3050e was priced at $100, while the Core i7-930 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($100 vs $294), Athlon Silver 3050e was $194 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050e delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 10.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-930 — making the Athlon Silver 3050e the 98.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i7-930 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-66% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8+192% | 10.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon Silver 3050e and Core i7-930
