
Athlon Silver 3050e

Xeon E5-2637
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon Silver 3050e is positioned at rank 699 and the Xeon E5-2637 is on rank 1010, so the Athlon Silver 3050e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon Silver 3050e
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2637
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Dali (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+50%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($60) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon Silver 3050e and Xeon E5-2637

Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2637
The Xeon E5-2637 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 5120 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,978 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon Silver 3050e and Xeon E5-2637 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2637 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050e scores 2,979 against the Xeon E5-2637's 2,978 — a 0% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050e. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,175 vs 2,000 (52% advantage for the Xeon E5-2637). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 758 vs 550, a 31.8% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050e that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,494 vs 1,500 (0.4% advantage for the Xeon E5-2637). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon Silver 3050e vs 5120 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3 GHz+114% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 5120 kB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 2,979 | 2,978 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,175 | 2,000+70% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 758+38% | 550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,494 | 1,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2637 — the Athlon Silver 3050e supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2637 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 32 — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2637). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2637) — the Xeon E5-2637 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Dalí (Athlon Silver 3050e) and C600,X79 (Xeon E5-2637).
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400+79900% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | 384 GB+1258291100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 40+400% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2637). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2637 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2637 targets Server.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Athlon Silver 3050e launched at $100 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2637 debuted at $885. At current prices ($60 vs $40), the Xeon E5-2637 is $20 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050e delivers 49.6 pts/$ vs 74.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2637 — making the Xeon E5-2637 the 40% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Xeon E5-2637 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-89% | $885 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $40-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.6 | 74.5+50% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















