
Athlon Silver 3050e

FX-4300
Athlon Silver 3050e vs FX-4300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver 3050e vs FX-4300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver 3050e vs FX-4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while FX-4300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,979 vs 2,995).
FX-4300
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.5 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-4300 better than Athlon Silver 3050e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver 3050e vs FX-4300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.

FX-4300
The FX-4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,995 points. Launch price was $122.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver 3050e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus 4 GHz on the FX-4300 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the FX-4300 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050e scores 2,979 against the FX-4300's 2,995 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-4300.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+171% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4096 kB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,979 | 2,995 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,494 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon Silver 3050e) / not specified (FX-4300). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the FX-4300 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver 3050e was priced at $100, while the FX-4300 came in at $122. On launch pricing ($100 vs $122), Athlon Silver 3050e was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050e delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the FX-4300 — making the Athlon Silver 3050e the 19.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-18% | $122 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8+22% | 24.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















