Core i5-430UM vs Pentium E6500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-430UM vs Pentium E6500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-430UM vs Pentium E6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-430UM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium E6500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E6500

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,185).
❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Core i5-430UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-430UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-430UM better than Pentium E6500?

Yes. Core i5-430UM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-430UM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-430UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-430UM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-430UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E6500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-430UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-430UM vs Pentium E6500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-430UM

The Core i5-430UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E6500

The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-430UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E6500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Core i5-430UM versus 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 — a 60.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-430UM (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i5-430UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-430UM scores 1,185 against the Pentium E6500's 1,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-430UM. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-430UM vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6500.

Feature	Core i5-430UM	Pentium E6500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.73 GHz+86%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.93 GHz+144%
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,185	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-430UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-430UM	Pentium E6500
Socket	BGA1288	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-430UM) / not specified (Pentium E6500). The Core i5-430UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium E6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430UM targets Legacy Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i5-430UM rivals Pentium SU7300.