Celeron N2806 vs Core i5-430UM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2806 vs Core i5-430UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2806 vs Core i5-430UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2806

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 18W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-430UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-430UM

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron N2806 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,195).
❌350% higher power demand at 18W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2806 better than Core i5-430UM?

Yes. Celeron N2806 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2806 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2806 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2806 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2806 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2806 vs Core i5-430UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-430UM

The Core i5-430UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2806 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-430UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 versus 1.73 GHz on the Core i5-430UM — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N2806 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron N2806 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-430UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2806 scores 1,195 against the Core i5-430UM's 1,185 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron N2806. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2806 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-430UM.

Feature	Celeron N2806	Core i5-430UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz+16%	1.73 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+33%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,195	1,185
Geekbench 6 Single	—	250
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2806 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-430UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2806	Core i5-430UM
Socket	FCBGA1170	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N2806) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-430UM). The Core i5-430UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron N2806 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430UM targets Legacy Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i5-430UM rivals Pentium SU7300.