Celeron N2806 vs Pentium E6600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2806 vs Pentium E6600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2806 vs Pentium E6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2806

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E6600

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,194 vs 1,195).
❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron N2806 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2806 better than Pentium E6600?

Yes. Celeron N2806 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2806 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2806 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2806 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E6600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2806 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2806 vs Pentium E6600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E6600

The Pentium E6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,194 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2806 and Pentium E6600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 versus 0.07 GHz on the Pentium E6600 — a 186.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N2806 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Celeron N2806 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E6600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2806 scores 1,195 against the Pentium E6600's 1,194 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron N2806. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2806	Pentium E6600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+2757%	0.07 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	3.06 GHz+91%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,195	1,194

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2806 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.