Celeron N2806 vs Turion 64 ML-28

Celeron N2806 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N2806

2 / 2

1,195

0.0%

1,201

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2806 vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2806 vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2806

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,195 vs 1,201).

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2806 better than Turion 64 ML-28?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2806 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-28 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2806 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2806 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2806 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2806 vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion 64 ML-28

The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2806 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N2806 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron N2806. The Celeron N2806 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2806 scores 1,195 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion 64 ML-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2806	Turion 64 ML-28
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+25%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,195	1,201

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2806 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.