Core i5-4402E vs Xeon E5607

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4402E vs Xeon E5607 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4402E vs Xeon E5607: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4402E

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,681 vs 2,686).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5607, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon E5607

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5607 better than Core i5-4402E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5607 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4402E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5607 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5607 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5607 comes in $131 cheaper on MSRP at $135 MSRP versus $266 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-4402E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 97.4% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4402E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4402E vs Xeon E5607 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4402E

The Core i5-4402E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,681 points. Launch price was $266.

Xeon E5607

The Xeon E5607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,686 points. Launch price was $135.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4402E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5607 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5607 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4402E versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5607 — a 163.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-4402E (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core i5-4402E uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5607 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4402E scores 2,681 against the Xeon E5607's 2,686 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5607. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4402E vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5607.

Feature	Core i5-4402E	Xeon E5607
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+900%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.26 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	3 MB	8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,681	2,686

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4402E uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5607 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4402E	Xeon E5607
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4402E was priced at $266, while the Xeon E5607 came in at $135. On launch pricing ($266 vs $135), Xeon E5607 was $131 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4402E delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5607 — making the Xeon E5607 the 65.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4402E	Xeon E5607
MSRP	$266	$135-49%
Performance per Dollar	10.1	19.9+97%
Release Date	2013	2011

Search Core i5-4402E on Amazon

Search Xeon E5607 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.