Core i5-450M vs Pentium SU2700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-450M vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-450M vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-450M

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($32 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 211.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($32 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,264 vs 1,268).
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 39.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $32 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-450M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-450M better than Pentium SU2700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-450M is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-450M is the better buy right now. Core i5-450M comes in $68 cheaper on MSRP at $32 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium SU2700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 211.5% better value on MSRP (39.5 vs 12.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-450M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-450M vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-450M

The Core i5-450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,264 points. Launch price was $32.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-450M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i5-450M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core i5-450M versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 68.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-450M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-450M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-450M scores 1,264 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium SU2700. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-450M vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU2700.

Feature	Core i5-450M	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.66 GHz+105%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,264	1,268

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-450M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-450M	Pentium SU2700
Socket	PGA988	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-450M) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The Core i5-450M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-450M rivals AMD Turion II M620.

Feature	Core i5-450M	Pentium SU2700
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-450M was priced at $32, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($32 vs $100), Core i5-450M was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-450M delivers 39.5 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Core i5-450M the 102.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-450M	Pentium SU2700
MSRP	$32-68%	$100
Performance per Dollar	39.5+211%	12.7
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Core i5-450M on Amazon

Search Pentium SU2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.