Core i5-4570 vs Xeon E5-2643

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4570 vs Xeon E5-2643 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4570 vs Xeon E5-2643: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4570

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 84W instead of 130W, a 46W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E5-2643 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2643.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E5-2643

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,228 vs 5,237).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,552 MSRP, while Core i5-4570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌54.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 84W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4570 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4570.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4570 better than Xeon E5-2643?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2643 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4570 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4570 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2643 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-4570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2643 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2643 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4570 vs Xeon E5-2643 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4570

The Core i5-4570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,237 points. Launch price was $221.

Xeon E5-2643

The Xeon E5-2643 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,228 points. Launch price was $218.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4570 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2643's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4570 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4570 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-4570 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4570 scores 5,237 against the Xeon E5-2643's 5,228 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-4570. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4570 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2643.

Feature	Core i5-4570	Xeon E5-2643
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	10240 kB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	5,237	5,228
Geekbench 6 Single	1,114	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4570 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4570	Xeon E5-2643
Socket	LGA1150	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4570) / not specified (Xeon E5-2643). The Core i5-4570 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2643 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4570 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4570 rivals FX-8320.