Core i5-460M
VS
Athlon II X2 265

Core i5-460M vs Athlon II X2 265

Intel

Core i5-460M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 265

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-460M is positioned at rank 7 and the Athlon II X2 265 is on rank 884, so the Core i5-460M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-460M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
111%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
109%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
100%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
100%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
99%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
96%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
92%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
92%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
89%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
82%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
81%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
80%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 265

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19543%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18466%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13408%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4039%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3200%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2799%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1603%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1582%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1441%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1441%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1424%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1386%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1367%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1361%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1349%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
100%
#885
Core i3-2100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $10
99%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
99%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
98%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
98%
#889
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
98%
#890
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
98%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
97%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
97%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
97%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
96%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
96%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-460M leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II X2 265 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-460MAthlon II X2 265
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($129)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X2 265 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 88% cheaper ($15 vs $129) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-460MAthlon II X2 265
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+762%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($129)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-460M and Athlon II X2 265

Intel

Core i5-460M

The Core i5-460M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,321 points. Launch price was $80.

AMD

Athlon II X2 265

The Athlon II X2 265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $83.

Processing Power

The Core i5-460M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II X2 265's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-460M versus 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X2 265 — a 16.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 265 (base: 2.53 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-460M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 265 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-460M scores 1,321 against the Athlon II X2 265's 1,324 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 265. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 343 vs 275, a 22% lead for the Core i5-460M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-460M vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 265.

FeatureCore i5-460MAthlon II X2 265
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz
3.3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,321
1,324
Geekbench 6 Single
343+25%
275
Geekbench 6 Multi
520
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-460M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 265 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-460M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 265 — the Core i5-460M supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 265 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-460M) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 265) — the Core i5-460M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-460M) and 760G,780G,785G,790GX,870,880G,890GX,890FX (Athlon II X2 265).

FeatureCore i5-460MAthlon II X2 265
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8
16 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-460M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 265). The Core i5-460M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X2 265 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 265 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-460M rivals AMD Turion II M620; Athlon II X2 265 rivals Pentium E6700.

FeatureCore i5-460MAthlon II X2 265
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-460M launched at $80 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 265 debuted at $83. At current prices ($129 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 265 is $114 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-460M delivers 10.2 pts/$ vs 88.3 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 265 — making the Athlon II X2 265 the 158.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-460MAthlon II X2 265
MSRP
$80-4%
$83
Avg Price (30d)
$129
$15-88%
Performance per Dollar
10.2
88.3+766%
Release Date
2010
2010