Core i5-460M vs Xeon 5148

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-460M vs Xeon 5148 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-460M vs Xeon 5148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-460M

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 40W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Xeon 5148 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Xeon 5148 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 5148

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,315 vs 1,321).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-460M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-460M better than Xeon 5148?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5148 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-460M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-460M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 17 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-460M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-460M is the better buy right now. Core i5-460M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-460M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-460M vs Xeon 5148 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-460M

The Core i5-460M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,321 points. Launch price was $80.

Xeon 5148

The Xeon 5148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,315 points. Launch price was $9.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-460M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon 5148's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-460M versus 2.33 GHz on the Xeon 5148 — a 18.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-460M. The Core i5-460M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon 5148 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-460M scores 1,321 against the Xeon 5148's 1,315 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-460M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-460M vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5148.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Xeon 5148
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+20%	2.33 GHz
Base Clock	2.53 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,321	1,315
Geekbench 6 Single	343	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-460M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5148 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Xeon 5148
Socket	PGA988	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-460M) / not specified (Xeon 5148). The Core i5-460M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Xeon 5148 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-460M rivals AMD Turion II M620.