PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-460M vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-460M vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-460M

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $116 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,321 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on PGA988, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +549.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+566.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Delivers 673.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 16.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA988 and older memory support.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
145% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-460M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i5-460M?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 549.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1794.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 549.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1794.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 566.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 145.0% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 549.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 673.3% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 16.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2010), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of PGA988, 566.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-460M vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-460M

The Core i5-460M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,321 points. Launch price was $80.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-460M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-460M versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-460M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-460M scores 1,321 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 179.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 343 vs 2,407, a 150.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-460M vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.6 GHz+64%
Base Clock	2.53 GHz+1%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+567%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	1,321	25,029+1795%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	343	2,407+602%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-460M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-460M versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 350.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-460M) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-460M) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Core i5-460M	Core i5-13400F
Socket	PGA988	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+350%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	192 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-460M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i5-460M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-460M rivals AMD Turion II M620; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-460M was priced at $80, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($80 vs $196), Core i5-460M was $116 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-460M delivers 16.5 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 154.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$80-59%	$196
Performance per Dollar	16.5	127.7+674%
Release Date	2010	2023

Search Core i5-460M on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.