Core i5-460M vs Turion Neo X2 L625

Core i5-460M vs Turion Neo X2 L625 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-460M

2 / 4

1,321

+0.6%

1,313

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-460M vs Turion Neo X2 L625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-460M vs Turion Neo X2 L625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-460M

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Turion Neo X2 L625 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Turion Neo X2 L625 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Turion Neo X2 L625

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,313 vs 1,321).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-460M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-460M better than Turion Neo X2 L625?

Yes. Core i5-460M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-460M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-460M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-460M is the better buy right now. Core i5-460M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-460M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-460M vs Turion Neo X2 L625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-460M

The Core i5-460M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,321 points. Launch price was $80.

Turion Neo X2 L625

The Turion Neo X2 L625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,313 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-460M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion Neo X2 L625's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-460M versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion Neo X2 L625 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-460M. The Core i5-460M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-460M scores 1,321 against the Turion Neo X2 L625's 1,313 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-460M.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Turion Neo X2 L625
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+75%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.53 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Congo (2009)
PassMark	1,321	1,313
Geekbench 6 Single	343	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-460M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-460M	Turion Neo X2 L625
Socket	PGA988	ASB1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-460M) / not specified (Turion Neo X2 L625). The Core i5-460M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Turion Neo X2 L625 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-460M rivals AMD Turion II M620.