Core i5-480M
VS
Athlon II X2 270

Core i5-480M vs Athlon II X2 270

Intel

Core i5-480M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 270

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-480M is positioned at rank 6 and the Athlon II X2 270 is on rank 825, so the Core i5-480M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-480M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
111%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
109%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
100%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
100%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
99%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
95%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
91%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
91%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
89%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
82%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
81%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16840%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15912%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11554%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3481%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2757%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2412%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1381%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1363%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1241%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1241%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1227%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1194%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1178%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1173%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1162%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
100%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
99%
#831
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
99%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
98%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X2 270 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-480M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-480MAthlon II X2 270
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X2 270 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 81% cheaper ($15 vs $77) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-480MAthlon II X2 270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+416%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-480M and Athlon II X2 270

Intel

Core i5-480M

The Core i5-480M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $81.

AMD

Athlon II X2 270

The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.

Processing Power

The Core i5-480M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II X2 270's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-480M versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 270 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-480M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 270 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-480M scores 1,327 against the Athlon II X2 270's 1,333 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X2 270. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-480M vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 270.

FeatureCore i5-480MAthlon II X2 270
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.93 GHz
3.4 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.66 GHz
3.4 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,327
1,333
Geekbench 6 Single
392
Geekbench 6 Multi
686
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-480M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 270 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-480M versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 270 — the Athlon II X2 270 supports 22.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 270 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-480M) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 270) — the Core i5-480M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-480M) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 270).

FeatureCore i5-480MAthlon II X2 270
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066
1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity
8
16+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-480M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X2 270 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-480M rivals AMD Turion II M620; Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700.

FeatureCore i5-480MAthlon II X2 270
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-480M launched at $81 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 270 debuted at $72. At current prices ($77 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 270 is $62 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-480M delivers 17.2 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 270 — making the Athlon II X2 270 the 135% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-480MAthlon II X2 270
MSRP
$81
$72-11%
Avg Price (30d)
$77
$15-81%
Performance per Dollar
17.2
88.9+417%
Release Date
2011
2011