
Core i5-480M vs Athlon II X2 270

Core i5-480M

Athlon II X2 270
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-480M is positioned at rank 6 and the Athlon II X2 270 is on rank 825, so the Core i5-480M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-480M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-480M | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-480M | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+416%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($77) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-480M and Athlon II X2 270

Core i5-480M
The Core i5-480M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $81.

Athlon II X2 270
The Athlon II X2 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $100.
Processing Power
The Core i5-480M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II X2 270's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-480M versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 270 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-480M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 270 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-480M scores 1,327 against the Athlon II X2 270's 1,333 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X2 270. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-480M vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 270.
| Feature | Core i5-480M | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.93 GHz | 3.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 3.4 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,327 | 1,333 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 392 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 686 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-480M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 270 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-480M versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 270 — the Athlon II X2 270 supports 22.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 270 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-480M) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 270) — the Core i5-480M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-480M) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 270).
| Feature | Core i5-480M | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | 1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | 16+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-480M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Athlon II X2 270 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-480M rivals AMD Turion II M620; Athlon II X2 270 rivals Pentium E6700.
| Feature | Core i5-480M | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-480M launched at $81 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 270 debuted at $72. At current prices ($77 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 270 is $62 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-480M delivers 17.2 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 270 — making the Athlon II X2 270 the 135% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-480M | Athlon II X2 270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $81 | $72-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $77 | $15-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 88.9+417% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















