Core i5-480M
VS
Atom x7-Z8700

Core i5-480M vs Atom x7-Z8700

Intel

Core i5-480M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-480M is positioned at rank #6 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-480M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
111%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
109%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
100%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
100%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
99%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
95%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
91%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
91%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
89%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
82%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
81%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-480M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom x7-Z8700 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-480MAtom x7-Z8700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-480MAtom x7-Z8700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($77)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-480M and Atom x7-Z8700

Intel

Core i5-480M

The Core i5-480M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,327 points. Launch price was $81.

Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-480M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7-Z8700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Core i5-480M versus 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-480M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-480M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x7-Z8700 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-480M scores 1,327 against the Atom x7-Z8700's 1,325 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-480M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-480M vs 0 kB on the Atom x7-Z8700.

FeatureCore i5-480MAtom x7-Z8700
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.93 GHz+22%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+66%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,327
1,325
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-480M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x7-Z8700 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i5-480M versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8700 — the Core i5-480M supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-480M) vs 2 (Atom x7-Z8700) — the Core i5-480M offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-480M) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8700).

FeatureCore i5-480MAtom x7-Z8700
Socket
PGA988
UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1066+35433%
LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8
8 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+700%
2
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-480M) / not specified (Atom x7-Z8700). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i5-480M) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8700) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-480M rivals AMD Turion II M620.

FeatureCore i5-480MAtom x7-Z8700
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true