Core i5-5250U
VS
Core i7-3667U

Core i5-5250U vs Core i7-3667U

Intel

Core i5-5250U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-3667U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-5250U is positioned at rank 685 and the Core i7-3667U is on rank 1197, so the Core i5-5250U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-5250U

#673
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
958%
#674
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
944%
#675
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
866%
#676
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
863%
#677
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
855%
#679
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
825%
#680
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
791%
#681
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
790%
#682
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
769%
#685
Core i5-5250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#695
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
98%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3667U

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5383%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5305%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4870%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4848%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4803%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4639%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4448%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4440%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4321%
#1197
Core i7-3667U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1198
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1199
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1200
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1201
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1202
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
94%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
94%
#1204
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1205
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
93%
#1206
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1207
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
90%
#1208
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1210
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
#1211
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-3667U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-5250U in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-5250UCore i7-3667U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-5250UCore i7-3667U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-5250U and Core i7-3667U

Intel

Core i5-5250U

The Core i5-5250U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,450 points. Launch price was $315.

Intel

Core i7-3667U

The Core i7-3667U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,451 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-5250U and Core i7-3667U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-5250U versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3667U — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-3667U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-5250U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3667U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5250U scores 2,450 against the Core i7-3667U's 2,451 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-3667U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5250U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3667U.

FeatureCore i5-5250UCore i7-3667U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,450
2,451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-5250U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3667U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the Core i5-5250U versus 1600 on the Core i7-3667U — the Core i5-5250U supports 15.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3667U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-5250U) vs 16 (Core i7-3667U) — the Core i7-3667U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Broadwell-U (Core i5-5250U) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3667U).

FeatureCore i5-5250UCore i7-3667U
Socket
FCBGA1168
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+17%
1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
32+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 6000 (Core i5-5250U) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3667U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3667U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore i5-5250UCore i7-3667U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 6000
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true