Core i5-5250U vs Core i7-4610Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-5250U vs Core i7-4610Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-5250U vs Core i7-4610Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-5250U

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i7-4610Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-5250U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,450).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-5250U better than Core i7-4610Y?

Yes. Core i5-5250U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-5250U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-5250U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-5250U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-5250U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-5250U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-5250U vs Core i7-4610Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-5250U

The Core i5-5250U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,450 points. Launch price was $315.

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-5250U and Core i7-4610Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-5250U versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610Y (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i5-5250U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-5250U scores 2,450 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-5250U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-5250U vs 4 MB on the Core i7-4610Y.

Feature	Core i5-5250U	Core i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	2.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,450	2,446
Geekbench 6 Single	—	700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,350

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1168 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the Core i5-5250U versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4610Y — the Core i5-5250U supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 12 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Broadwell-U (Core i5-5250U) and Haswell Y (Core i7-4610Y).

Feature	Core i5-5250U	Core i7-4610Y
Socket	FCBGA1168	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i5-5250U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 6000 (Core i5-5250U) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i7-4610Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.

Feature	Core i5-5250U	Core i7-4610Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 6000	Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Ultrabook/Tablet