Core i5-540M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Core i5-540M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-540M

2 / 4

1,796

+1.1%

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2 / 2

1,777

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-540M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-540M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-540M

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,777 vs 1,796).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-540M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-540M better than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82?

Yes. Core i5-540M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-540M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-540M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-540M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-540M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-540M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-540M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-540M

The Core i5-540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $257.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,777 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-540M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.07 GHz on the Core i5-540M versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 — a 33% clock advantage for the Core i5-540M. The Core i5-540M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-540M scores 1,796 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82's 1,777 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-540M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-540M vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82.

Feature	Core i5-540M	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.07 GHz+40%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.53 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,796+1%	1,777
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-540M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-540M	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Socket	PGA988	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-540M) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82). The Core i5-540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-540M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-540M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.