
Athlon II X3 445
Popular choices:

Core i5-540M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon II X3 445
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while Core i5-540M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-540M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-540M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Athlon II X3 445 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,796 vs 1,807).
Athlon II X3 445
2010Core i5-540M
2010Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Athlon II X3 445 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $87 MSRP, while Core i5-540M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-540M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,796 vs 1,807).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X3 445 better than Core i5-540M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X3 445 and Core i5-540M

Athlon II X3 445
Athlon II X3 445
The Athlon II X3 445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $91.

Core i5-540M
Core i5-540M
The Core i5-540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $257.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X3 445 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i5-540M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X3 445 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X3 445 versus 3.07 GHz on the Core i5-540M — a 1% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 445 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Athlon II X3 445 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-540M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 445 scores 1,807 against the Core i5-540M's 1,796 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X3 445. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 445 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-540M.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+23% | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Rana (2009−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,807 | 1,796 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 700 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X3 445 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-540M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 445 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 445) vs 16 (Core i5-540M) — the Core i5-540M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 445) and HM55,QM57,HM57,QS57,PM55 (Core i5-540M).
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X3 445) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-540M). The Core i5-540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II X3 445 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-540M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-540M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.
| Feature | Athlon II X3 445 | Core i5-540M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













