Core i5-540UM
VS
Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Core i5-540UM vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Intel

Core i5-540UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-540UM is positioned at rank 1081 and the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is on rank 999, so the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-540UM

#1068
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2928%
#1069
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2885%
#1070
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2649%
#1071
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2637%
#1072
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2613%
#1074
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2523%
#1075
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2419%
#1076
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2415%
#1077
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2350%
#1080
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1081
Core i5-540UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1082
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1083
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
99%
#1088
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
96%
#1089
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
95%
#1092
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
95%
#1093
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1095
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual-Core E2200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
31646%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
29903%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
21712%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6541%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5181%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4532%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2596%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2562%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2333%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2333%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2306%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2244%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2213%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2204%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2184%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
98%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
97%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
96%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
95%
#1005
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
95%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
94%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
94%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
93%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
93%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
92%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
91%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
91%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-540UM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-540UM and Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Intel

Core i5-540UM

The Core i5-540UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 985 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-540UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual-Core E2200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-540UM versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2200. The Core i5-540UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-540UM scores 1,002 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2200's 985 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-540UM. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-540UM vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200.

FeatureCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2200
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB (total)+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,002+2%
985
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-540UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Core i5-540UM versus DDR2-800 on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — the Core i5-540UM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-540UM supports up to 8 of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-540UM) vs 0 (Pentium Dual-Core E2200) — the Core i5-540UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2200
Socket
BGA1288
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800+39900%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8
4 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-540UM) vs VT-x (Pentium Dual-Core E2200). The Core i5-540UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Dual-Core E2200 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-540UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.

FeatureCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop